Way to go is portable storage (in my humble opinion).......SSD seems the way to go...but those things are way too expensive....
Maybe future games will be on tiny 1TB (Superfast) SD cards...like this...Way to go is portable storage (in my humble opinion)....
My workstation runs a cheap arse crappy HardDisk which only holds the OS and my work Apps (so lowest capacity).... everything else has it's very own portable drive.
In theory, yes. Quantum technology is the answer. Quantum computer is about 100 million times faster than PC as we know. Once QC is revealed as budget price/size PC, everyone could easily emulate PS7 and X3.Do you think 40 years from now there will be a console 100,000 more powerful than XBOX ONE X?
And yet, Atari 2600 games load faster.It's amazing how far video game tech has advanced in 40 years.
XBOX ONE X is over 100,000 times more powerful than Atari 2600
I haven't once been teabagged in an Atari 2600 gameAnd yet, Atari 2600 games load faster.
But Atari games only had 4kb of data to load...it shouldn't take too long...compared to loading a game thats 30-50gb...And yet, Atari 2600 games load faster.
Don't know about your private interests but I'm marking that as another plus in favor of Atari 2600 games.I haven't once been teabagged in an Atari 2600 game
Ah, but such games would never load 30 to 50 GB on start, most of that data is buffered when the game requires it.But Atari games only had 4kb of data to load...it shouldn't take too long...compared to loading a game thats 30-50gb...
a quantum cryptology guy from Harvard or something gave a talk at my community college a few months back.It remains to be seen how they can be useful for our average gaming needs. And anyway you currently need a massively cold fridge to keep it running.
Well hopefully that's the pointi don't particularly know how DRM works