1. Hello Guest! It's with a heavy heart that we must announce the removal of the Legacy GMC Archive. If you wish to save anything from it, now's the time! Please see this topic for more information.
    Dismiss Notice

Suggestion Next game maker version suggestion

Discussion in 'Community Chat' started by Forgeio, Jun 28, 2016.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Forgeio

    Forgeio Member

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2016
    Posts:
    17
    Alright, so for the next game maker version (I think it's called game maker: next?) they are supposed to be adding a ton of cool things and kind of remaking the style of game maker. My suggestion for this new version of game maker, if they're not already planning it, is WAY more 3D functionality in game maker, or a way better more optimized game maker 3D function. Maybe even a 3D model editor? That would just make my experience on game maker a THOUSAND times better, as I could finally make some 3D games that aren't crap instead of 2D games. (Don't get me wrong, I love 2D games, but 3D is a major thing in today's gaming industries.) Even if it starts out simple and lame, it wouldn't matter, as long as its way better made and optimized with maybe a very simplistic 3D physics system and a simple 3D model creator.
    Thanks for listening to my ramble, if you know any Game Maker developers, please let them know about my suggestion and how much of a huge thing it would be for game maker. I'm almost certain it would gain tons of new developers of awesome new indie games.

    - Forgeio
     
  2. Snail Man

    Snail Man Member

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2016
    Posts:
    282
    This suggestion has been batted back and forth by the community so many times, I'm pretty sure all the arguments have been hashed and rehashed countless times, but what it boils down to is direction. GameMaker is currently one of the, if not the foremost 2D game development tool, but in the 3D arena, there are giants like Unity and UE that are already so established they'd be next to impossible to unseat. Why not focus on what GM is already good at?
     
    Storyteller and ParodyKnaveBob like this.
  3. Forgeio

    Forgeio Member

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2016
    Posts:
    17
    Well, because it's already good enough at it, and I honestly don't care about how good unity and UE are. They both in the long run are not as simplistic for making games, they are really complicated and hard to learn, game maker language was made to be simple and easy to learn. C# is pretty difficult to learn and Unity is a very complicated yet powerful program. As for UE, its more for making graphics than games, I've really never seen a nice full game made with UE4.
     
  4. Forgeio

    Forgeio Member

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2016
    Posts:
    17
    I was thinking more like optimized for the game creator, not the game player. But your right, it is pretty optimized on the user end.
     
  5. RangerX

    RangerX Member

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2016
    Posts:
    2,602
    Without GMS it would be very sad day for 2D gaming.
    Use tools for what they are designed for. And I agree with Snail Man, we need strong/good tools that are good at what they do. 3D gaming is already well covered.
     
    Forgeio likes this.
  6. alexde5th

    alexde5th Member

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2016
    Posts:
    93
    Maybe some new functions, like deactivating and reactivating an object automatically...
    oh wait, that's already in.
    Why not a function that allows...
    I think I'll stop. Every idea I have would probably already be in.
     
  7. Snail Man

    Snail Man Member

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2016
    Posts:
    282
    But other people do care: all extending GM 3D would do is please existing GM customers, because most newcomers will just take the extra time to learn the new language of C# rather than the new language of GML
     
  8. Forgeio

    Forgeio Member

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2016
    Posts:
    17
    I don't agree, I think game maker could become great in both areas. Unity and UE are pretty poorly made for coding in (I haven't used them much, so I could be wrong) but they just don't seem as simple and easy to use as they could be.
     
  9. Forgeio

    Forgeio Member

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2016
    Posts:
    17
    I guess that's true, and that part of my argument is a bit invalid, but I still think it would be an awesome addition to Game Maker, and I've seen game maker users create their own 3D model creators (mine-imator is one of them) and work out great, so I know it can be done, and done well.
     
  10. GhostlyFeline

    GhostlyFeline Member

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2016
    Posts:
    100
    Like others have said, there's a lot of engines that already do 3D stuff very well. One of the reasons that I tend to use Game Maker over, say, Unreal, is because of all the features and ease of use for creating 2D games. Focusing on 3D features would not be a good path, since other engines do it way better already, and Game Maker would just be playing catch-up.

    Oh, and for the record, I have used Unreal 4. Blueprint scripting isn't that hard.
     
    funkygallo likes this.
  11. The ability to easily identify where all of your variables are being called or used, or any object or anything! Maybe put it in the debugger, some kind of ability that you can say put in the object name or the variable name and it just tell you all the areas it's used so you can quickly make easy changes or track down legacy pieces that need to be removed or even if a variable is now obsolete and can be removed. Maybe it's a tall order, or maybe not?
     
  12. slayer 64

    slayer 64 Member

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2016
    Posts:
    69
    I really think game maker should have a way to create scripts within objects.
     
  13. Still57

    Still57 Member

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2016
    Posts:
    75
    I don't know what improvements they'll make in the next version but they should definitely make an AdMob extension for Windows Phone
     
  14. gitwalrus

    gitwalrus Member

    Joined:
    Jun 24, 2016
    Posts:
    20
    How about better support in the editor for high DPI displays? The game itself works fine the editor does not. All kinds of glitches and artifacts in the editor. It works but it looks unprofessional and if GameMaker wants to loose the reputation of being a kid's toy they need to make it look professional.
     
  15. gitwalrus

    gitwalrus Member

    Joined:
    Jun 24, 2016
    Posts:
    20
    It is for me as well but my programmer friends have not yet been enlightened and a buggy editor won't do that. I use GameMaker for about 85% of my 2d project I understand that it is a professional tool now it just needs to look like one.
     
  16. hippyman

    hippyman Member

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2016
    Posts:
    565
    Methods would make me freakin' ecstatic!
     
    Lukan likes this.
  17. Xskode

    Xskode Member

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2016
    Posts:
    55
    they can input a live editor. like unity 3d have.

    so you can start the game up. and if you find something, or run into an error you can just fix it without having to close the game then open it again.
    I am sure many of us (if not all) would REALLY benefit from such a feature.
     
  18. gitwalrus

    gitwalrus Member

    Joined:
    Jun 24, 2016
    Posts:
    20
    Yes. If they like it they will buy it and that means more money for YYG meaning more features for us. Besides the lack of proper support for high DPI in the editor makes it annoying to use as well.
     
  19. F_Clowder

    F_Clowder Guest

    I wish YYG would implement a coffee-making routine into GM:Next. Please?
     
  20. gitwalrus

    gitwalrus Member

    Joined:
    Jun 24, 2016
    Posts:
    20
    https://www.xkcd.com/378/
    I think this applies here. ;)
     
    The M, Mike, chance and 2 others like this.
  21. Nocturne

    Nocturne Friendly Tyrant Forum Staff Admin

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2016
    Posts:
    7,046
    Topic is closed. Speculation and suggestions for the next version of GMS are not something that serves the community any purpose right now... YoYoGames have very clear idea of what they want to and so anything posted here will fall on deaf ears and only give rise to rumours and half-baked "I heard that..." comments about the future.
     
    Forgeio and Lonewolff like this.
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice