Pineapple Lake
Member
Hi everyone,
If been using GMS 2.2.5 for my project for a while now but finally trying to make the switch to GMS 2.3.
However, I noticed that the built Windows executables take up a LOT more CPU than when built with 2.2.5 (YYC/VM makes no difference)
(using Windows Task Manager)
-Made in v2.2.5: cpu usage 2-3%
-Made in v2.3.1 stable: cpu usage 10-11%
-Made in v2.3.2 stable: cpu usage 13-14%
This is the EXACT same project, only the GMS version to build the executable differs.
When checking out the performance in the Debug Profiler it seems there are no big differences between the projects.
Memory use is actually lower on the newest versions (100MB compared to 130MB)
Disabling the garbage collector takes off 3-4% but still there's a big increase.
What's up with that? And why is cpu load increasing in every new version?
Anyone else experiencing this?
I'm worried my project will have trouble running on older systems.
My specs:
-AMD Ryzen 5 3600
-16GB RAM
-AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
If been using GMS 2.2.5 for my project for a while now but finally trying to make the switch to GMS 2.3.
However, I noticed that the built Windows executables take up a LOT more CPU than when built with 2.2.5 (YYC/VM makes no difference)
(using Windows Task Manager)
-Made in v2.2.5: cpu usage 2-3%
-Made in v2.3.1 stable: cpu usage 10-11%
-Made in v2.3.2 stable: cpu usage 13-14%
This is the EXACT same project, only the GMS version to build the executable differs.
When checking out the performance in the Debug Profiler it seems there are no big differences between the projects.
Memory use is actually lower on the newest versions (100MB compared to 130MB)
Disabling the garbage collector takes off 3-4% but still there's a big increase.
What's up with that? And why is cpu load increasing in every new version?
Anyone else experiencing this?
I'm worried my project will have trouble running on older systems.
My specs:
-AMD Ryzen 5 3600
-16GB RAM
-AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
Last edited: