Discussion Google Stadia: your thoughts

Discussion in 'Off Topic' started by Misu, Mar 20, 2019.

  1. Misu

    Misu The forum's immigrant

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2016
    Posts:
    636
    So Google Stadia has been announced. I like the idea how it tries to enhance gameplay experience by increase performance and memory using streaming service but I dont like how it destroys gaming tradition. The fact its just a web stream service on any device makes me feel like its just an ordinary Steam imitation except without the app. I dont feel the patriotism in here however it does sound powerful enough for any device, including low end devices. Seems to be fun to see how far you can create with it.



    What are your thoughts about this? Do you think it be a cool alternative to help discover beyond the boundaries of your game development?
     
  2. Siolfor the Jackal

    Siolfor the Jackal Member

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2016
    Posts:
    709
    Given that internet over here in Australia is consistently terrible, I don't think it's going to be all that reliable a service here and anywhere with similar internet problems.
     
  3. curato

    curato Member

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2016
    Posts:
    179
    Yeah just about anything should be able to run it. If it is basically a thin client taking input and showing you output then you could run some intense games without very little hardware, but I still prefer physical games I can play if the internet is down.
     
  4. O.Stogden

    O.Stogden Member

    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2018
    Posts:
    200
    Yeah, not a fan of the idea of cloud gaming, never have been.

    Played PS Now on a 100mbit connection, it played ok, but it was still dodgy from time to time, and if someone else was downloading in the house, regardless of how fast your net was, it could deteriorate the stream to a quality far lower than playing locally would be. You'd need a router with QoS to force your console to be given priority and restrict other devices speeds, but even then it can still have issues.

    I think it'll be the way things go, purely because it's a more efficient and probably profitable method for manufacturers and publishers in the long run (No shipping fees, don't have to have individual console for every person etc.), but I much prefer owning an actual console, because I'm old-fashioned.

    If you haven't got a consistently great connection, these things tend to be a disappointment, and won't come near to playing locally in terms of quality. Essentially online-DRM to the nth degree. :D
     
  5. nacho_chicken

    nacho_chicken Member

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2016
    Posts:
    302
    Considering the horrible internet infrastructure in countries like the US and Australia, it's too early for this to even be feasible. Not to mention a lot of extremely popular modern games (Dark Souls/Bloodborne/Sekiro, Monster Hunter, Devil May Cry, All fighting games) would be next to unplayable with even the best-case scenario of ~2 frames of lag.

    Streaming becoming mainstream for gaming will take a long time. You can currently stream video, music, etc. with almost no issues because the content is exactly the same for everyone and you can just prebuffer the content. Can't prebuffer gaming content, so any connection issues are going to be felt hard.
     
    Last edited: Mar 20, 2019
  6. RichHopefulComposer

    RichHopefulComposer Member

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2016
    Posts:
    1,360
    Like most people seem to be, I'm pretty skeptical. I played Stadia like ten years ago when it was called OnLive, and I wasn't super impressed. There was always lots of latency and ****ty video quality whenever my connection randomly dipped. I'd never play any game I really cared about like that. I also ****ing HATE the "games as service/subscription" trend, so I hope this fails miserably, even if they do somehow make it work for the most part.
     
  7. woodsmoke

    woodsmoke Member

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2016
    Posts:
    293
    "...highest possible performance and the best experience for players" Errr... no. The cloud may give you access to 10TF for beautiful graphics but at the end of the day you get a compressed image because of streaming. I prefer my pixels sharp even if the graphics settings are lower. And don't get me started on lag. That alone is a reason not the use it for the majority of games
     
    Last edited: Mar 21, 2019
    Ninety likes this.
  8. PrismaticRealms

    PrismaticRealms Member

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2018
    Posts:
    20
    I can see this being the future of gaming in an immaculate Black Mirror kind of future where everything runs in the cloud at near-infinite speeds with 0 latency. But we aren't there yet.
     
  9. nacho_chicken

    nacho_chicken Member

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2016
    Posts:
    302
    Ah, just playing a nice 4k streamed video game on my new television.
    *confetti flies everywhere*

    ...ah, just playing a nice 240p streamed video game on my new television.
     
    Kepons likes this.
  10. O.Stogden

    O.Stogden Member

    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2018
    Posts:
    200
    Haha, absolutely this.

    If you've ever watched a YouTube video of GTA V, if you go through the mesh tunnels in the stunt tracks of that game, the video degrades massively because the bitrate has to go through the roof to keep up with the rapid changing.

    Having to play like that would be very annoying and definitely mess up the experience.
     
  11. Ninety

    Ninety Member

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2016
    Posts:
    243
    what are you talking about siolfor. it only took me ten minutes and three dropouts to load this page. with speeds like this cloud based gaming is childs play. we are living in the future
     
  12. Cloaked Games

    Cloaked Games Member

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2016
    Posts:
    782
    I think the concept is cool, and it makes sense practically. Except for the fact that it depends on the internet connection so heavily. First, a LOT of people (entire countries) don't have internet up to the level that would be needed for this to work. Second, there is a real benefit to being able to play offline. Unless it's a multiplayer game, you should be able to play offline.

    However, I don't think this means it will flop horribly. I think there are enough people who will get it and be totally happy with it. I just think that there will still always be a place in the market for traditional consoles, even as we approach 0-latency network connections. Especially portable consoles like the Switch have huge appeal because you can take it with you on a train or an airplane or wherever and you can still play all your games.

    Plus, I'm skeptical that Google is going to find enough 3rd party developers willing to make games for Stadia to even make the buy-in price worth it. Who knows though, Stadia could theoretically be super affordable since it doesn't rely on an actual piece of hardware. If the service is free (though of course, it won't), then you have an appeal because you suddenly just have to buy games, instead of a 400 dollar console plus games. And, for many games, the latency wouldn't be such an issue, like with a tactical RPG or something. But they haven't given any information about pricing.
     
  13. GM029

    GM029 Member

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2017
    Posts:
    89
    In the future this will most likely be how all gaming is consumed but for now it's probably not ready yet.

    It would be neat being able to play very graphically intensive games at 4k/60fps on a toaster lol.
     
  14. JackTurbo

    JackTurbo Member

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2016
    Posts:
    791
    I'm skeptical. I get noticeable input lag when I play pc games on my TV via Steam link. That only streaming across the breadth of my house.

    Can't imagine there are many places where the infrastructure is sufficient to allow game streaming to a high enough quality to replace conventional installations.

    Also I've not heard anything about the business side of things? Is it like Steam but streaming or is it more of a Spotify/Netflix model? If so how does revenue work for devs etc
     
    RichHopefulComposer likes this.
  15. chance

    chance predictably random Forum Staff Moderator

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2016
    Posts:
    774
    I haven't noticed any lag with online Scrabble tournaments.
     
  16. woodsmoke

    woodsmoke Member

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2016
    Posts:
    293
    The name ain't helping either. I keep forgetting it even after I read it a minute ago.
     
    Kezarus likes this.
  17. Mert

    Mert Member

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2016
    Posts:
    277
    Google shuts down Google Plus, a social media website, and opens up Stadia, a social gaming website. (I know, it'll be a lot of social)

    Rest assured, Stadia will include a lot of things that Steam, Origin, Epic Store etc. do. There's a possibility that this project may overthrow;
    • Twitch (Game streaming. Stadia is just way more and more powerful than anything in the World.
    • Steam (It's obvious that noone wants to download & fill the disk space. Stadia can do better)
    • Discord (No need to say, highest quality at lightning speed)

    If Google can provide quantum quality servers throughout the world, then this can happen. I believe general internet infrastructure is sufficient for such platform. (Again if Google can bring their powerful servers to your region/area/city)
     
  18. Lucia

    Lucia Member

    Joined:
    Oct 12, 2018
    Posts:
    65
    Only for the contries with a good internet. But very good for a developer. He can developer a game just for PC and to have at the same time a game for mobile.
     
    Misu likes this.
  19. RichHopefulComposer

    RichHopefulComposer Member

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2016
    Posts:
    1,360
    Sounds like a ****ty tasting artificial sweetener or something to me. The name is bad, yeah. :x
     
    woodsmoke likes this.
  20. O.Stogden

    O.Stogden Member

    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2018
    Posts:
    200
    Stadia runs on a subscription service, so you pay monthly, rather than per game. They could quite possibly run different levels of subscription, like Netflix does, and have a premium service for 4k gaming and latest releases, and a lower subscription for 1080p streaming and releases 3+ months old or something.

    I would expect prices to be $20 a month, as other competing services charge the same, and I think anymore would be viewed as unreasonable.

    But if tech companies can't achieve 4k over a wired connection, the chances of any of us being able to stream games in 4k to our houses are slim.

    Google also definitely need to announce a mass amount of games soon, as right now, they're saying they're launching within the next 9 months and currently have 2 games announced for their system, one of which is old and most people who want it already have it. They probably want at least 100 games on the service at launch to give this a chance at working.

    As was mentioned above, turn-based and slow-paced games might work with this, but if you try and play any reaction game or any form of twitch-based shooter (Basically any online shooter), then Stadia is definitely off the table for the vast majority. I think it has merits, you can pay a subscription and basically pay for your console in instalments as it were, rather than paying a huge lump sum. But it also has the disadvantage that PS+ has, in that if you ever stop constantly paying them, they take all of your games away from you.

    So do you pay $20 a month (The expected pricing) for 6 years (The lifetime of a console) which = $1,440

    Or do you pay $400 for the console (brand new), and get 17 full price ($60) games for it, which = $1,420

    And remember that you get to keep your console and games with the bottom option.

    It depends on how much gaming you do, whether or not you have owned/paid for that many full price titles on your PS4/XBO. That's full price meaning you didn't get it discounted, and you buy all your games at the $60 RRP, which is unlikely.

    I know I've owned my PS4 since 2015, bought it for about $250, and have spent about $160 on PS+ and about $300 on games. So in 4 years I've spent about $700 on my PS4. So in my case, Stadia would be a more expensive choice ($960 for 4 years, not including any hardware), as I don't buy many full price games, I wait for sales and get them for $20-30 or so.
     
    RichHopefulComposer likes this.
  21. sitebender

    sitebender Member

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2016
    Posts:
    728
    Considering Google Chrome has lag for me streaming from my phone to my router to my TV, and OnLive failed, I can't imagine this going well for 100% of the people out there. I'm in America and there's no Internet connection problems.

    Somehow games streaming minimal amounts of data vs streaming videos of a computer playing a game seems like an issue.

    How's that Google Fiber doing? I'm amazed they threw in the towel on Google+.

    There are other services that let you use your phone as a controller and play games on your TV / PC.
     
    RichHopefulComposer likes this.
  22. Misty

    Misty Member

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2016
    Posts:
    1,006
    I don't see how Google can afford this service. They'd have to purchase 1 gaming pc for every new player that signs up. Also anyone with under a 50mb connection would get lag.
     
    Kezarus likes this.
  23. NeZvers

    NeZvers Member

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2018
    Posts:
    310
    Are you saying that all players will be playing games all the time?
     
  24. ajan-ko

    ajan-ko Member

    Joined:
    Aug 22, 2016
    Posts:
    262
    The only way they can do this is make 100 FREE AWESOME HIGH END SLOW PACED tactic/RPG/Puzzle games, and make it 20$ per month.
    Either that or streaming gaming will bound to fail. It just another bleeding edge.

    Playing action games on streaming device? I don't need to explain this, we all know what lag is.(=_=)a

    Edit: I got crazy Idea, just make an Stadia-MMO Exclusive designed for streaming. I think this might work, because you can play without download and you can use the server as the database.
     
    Last edited: Mar 28, 2019
    sitebender likes this.
  25. sofaspartan

    sofaspartan Member

    Joined:
    May 31, 2019
    Posts:
    5
    As a video game collector, I always love having tangible media. There's something very satisfying about being able to see games on shelves and being able to pick them up and put them into a console. I guess I am very old fashioned in this respect. Since all of this is cloud-based, it's sort of weird for me.

    Even so, I see how this kind of platform can benefit creators. With essentially no limitations on computing power, game developers can create without worrying about current console and computer limitations.
     
    Last edited: Jun 10, 2019
    The Sorcerer likes this.
  26. Kezarus

    Kezarus Member

    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2018
    Posts:
    128
    Google Glass, Google Plus... maybe Stadia is the next in line?

    As above, yes I think only places with pristine condition could actually benefit from it. Australia and Brazil (where I am from) don't put a dent on most of sales figures, but China and Russia do, and I belive their connection isn't that good either.

    For us, developers, Stadia could be good. Hey, another plataform to publish! But for gamers... I am not so sure.
     
  27. dapper

    dapper Member

    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2017
    Posts:
    18
    Google Reader, Google Hangouts, Google Wave, Google Trips, Youtube Gaming, Inbox by Gmail, Google Allo, Google URL Shortener...and more... have fun.

    As a gamer, I prize being able to play old games, and save/backup old games and saves. Why should I invest in a gaming library with a company like Google, which has a nasty habit of killing nearly all of its children? What's going to happen in two years if it doesn't meet their standards?

    Don't get me wrong- I like that the company is always trying new things. But, at some point, Google's propensity to kill things starts to factor into the adoption of the things themselves.
     
  28. sofaspartan

    sofaspartan Member

    Joined:
    May 31, 2019
    Posts:
    5
    I saw this the other day regarding what you can stream with your internet connection. Still pretty skeptical.
     

    Attached Files:

    Kezarus likes this.
  29. nacho_chicken

    nacho_chicken Member

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2016
    Posts:
    302
    There's also the looming threat of your data being capped. According to several articles I've seen, streaming 4K video could use 15 Gigabytes (not bits) per hour. Being throttled after a weekend or two of playing something like Skyrim sounds fun.
     
  30. Roa

    Roa Member

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2016
    Posts:
    540
    >thousands of players for single battle royal game >7000 edge nodes > google's backbone that doesn't get pushed to the internet

    all 3 of these things don't match up lmao. I'd like to know how 7000 server clusters are going to be pushing for potentially hundreds of thousands of users, and at 4k 60fps in real time. These guys are ****ing dreaming.
    Pushing the games at that limits is one thing, encoding it and busing it down stream is another, getting that final result from an edge node you are sharing with hundreds of others through the internet to your house is even more of a piss take.

    Calling bull**** on the whole thing. My high end OC i5 can barely record a 4k image at 60fps natively, let alone play a game behind that. When saving files at that rate with 160kb audio and cutting losses in encoding, its still over 90mbs a second! And unless one of these edge nodes are in my back yard supposedly going exclusively over googles proprietary network of connections without going through a single router or ISP, there is latency.

    I got an idea google, seems you have so much hardware to throw around, why not just give me a 12core I7, 2 AMD video cards at 10.7TFs each , in my own home for 9.99 a month lmao.I dont even think 9.99 would cover the bandwidth and electric let alone pay off all this infrastructure.

    These ****ty cloud schemes have got to stop. Especially when people are already concerned about the amount of power a company like Alphabet.inc and google have.
     
    Misty and Kezarus like this.
  31. woodsmoke

    woodsmoke Member

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2016
    Posts:
    293
    It would be funny if 4K is achieved through upscaling and not native.

    Personally I don't get streaming. Everything is compressed and doesn't look good plus the extra lag. I'd rather play old games on an dated computer\console.
     
    funkygallo, Misty and Kezarus like this.

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice