M
Misty
Guest
If I see a song, that I really, really, like, I should, as an artist, be allowed to use that song.
Why is Warhol allowed to use Cambell's soup w/o permission but we, as game artists, cannot use great licensed tunes? It above all should be as an art despite EA's attempts to make it not so.
As a law abiding citizen, I continue to obey and adhere to copyright rules and laws. But the anarchist in me is very upset. Why? Because I am not allowed to express myself as an artist in this corporate and consumerist world. Why should I be forced by the corporate boot to put in music that does not truly fit my grand artistic vision?
If my game succeeds I will gladly, gladly pay royalties.
Also, I don't think that mere commoners should be allowed this ability, but true and grand artists. Because of this I don't see it really proliferating or becoming that much of an issue. I don't consider most modern art to be true art I am talking about the legit.
Why is Warhol allowed to use Cambell's soup w/o permission but we, as game artists, cannot use great licensed tunes? It above all should be as an art despite EA's attempts to make it not so.
As a law abiding citizen, I continue to obey and adhere to copyright rules and laws. But the anarchist in me is very upset. Why? Because I am not allowed to express myself as an artist in this corporate and consumerist world. Why should I be forced by the corporate boot to put in music that does not truly fit my grand artistic vision?
If my game succeeds I will gladly, gladly pay royalties.
Also, I don't think that mere commoners should be allowed this ability, but true and grand artists. Because of this I don't see it really proliferating or becoming that much of an issue. I don't consider most modern art to be true art I am talking about the legit.
Last edited: